Difference between revisions of "Rutile"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Description == | == Description == | ||
| − | There are three naturally occurring isomorphic forms of [[titanium dioxide]]: [[anatase]], rutile, and [[brookite]]. Naturally occurring rutile can vary considerably in shape and in color (from yellow to brownish yellow, red, brown-red, brown, bluish or violet, rarely green, to greyish-black or black, due to various elemental impurities). Mineral rutile is mined from beach sand in Australia, and productive deposits also occur in Sierra Leone, South Africa, the United States, India, Norway, Sri Lanka, and Brazil. Small amounts of natural rutile may have been used as a pale yellow to red brown or nearly black pigment; however, it is difficult to grind and produces coarse, angular particles much different than the modern white pigment in color and morphology, and higher in impurities. Synthetic rutile gemstone crystals were first prepared in 1948 using the Verneuil process and can be produced in different colours depending on additives. | + | There are three naturally occurring isomorphic forms of [[titanium dioxide]]: [[anatase]], rutile, and [[brookite]]. Naturally occurring rutile can vary considerably in shape and in color (from yellow to brownish yellow, red, brown-red, brown, bluish or violet, rarely green, to greyish-black or black, due to various elemental impurities). Mineral rutile is mined from beach sand in Australia, and productive deposits also occur in Sierra Leone, South Africa, the United States, India, Norway, Sri Lanka, and Brazil. Small amounts of natural rutile may have been used as a pale yellow to red brown or nearly black pigment; however, it is difficult to grind and produces coarse, angular particles much different than the modern white pigment in color and morphology, and higher in impurities. Synthetic rutile gemstone crystals were first prepared in 1948 using the Verneuil process and can be produced in different colours depending on additives. |
| − | The anatase form of titanium dioxide was a common white pigment in the early 20th century. Anatase will transform to rutile on heating, and despite efforts to control this during the calcination step of pigment production, some early anatase pigments may have contained up to 20% of coarse, gritty rutile. The synthetic rutile pigment has significantly higher hiding power and greater resistance to chalking and discoloration on exposure to light than does the anatase pigment. Although experimental rutile pigments were patented in 1931 in Czechoslovakia, Germany and the United States, the first commercially viable methods for production were developed in 1937, based on the sulfate process, which used sulfuric acid to digest ilmenite or titaniferous slag. Industrial production began in 1938/39; in Europe, production was interrupted by World War II, and it was not until after 1945 that rutile pigment became available. The range of composition of the early white rutile pigments varied considerably, as various additives were used, including compounds of antimony, zinc, tin, magnesium, silicon and lithium, as well as anatase in some cases (to reduce cost). American products from 1939 on included: pure rutile (e.g., Titanox A-NC, coated with 1-2% aluminum oxide and silicon dioxide, manufactured until 1945); composites (e.g., Titanox RC grades, 30% titanium dioxide with calcium sulfate); and adulterations (e.g., Titanox M, 30% titanium dioxide with magnesium silicate; also titanated lithopones with 15% titanium dioxide). Although research to produce pigment from titanium tetrachloride had been underway since the 1920s, it was only when large quantities of chlorine were available to manufacturers that a pilot plant (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. in the United States) first produced pigment in 1948 using the chloride process. In this method, chlorine is reacted with an ore of high titanium dioxide content (generally rutile or synthetic rutile) followed by vapor phase oxidation. Anatase could also be produced using this method; however, it contained a significant amount of rutile and was only briefly offered. Because of differences in the manufacturing methods, sulfate process rutile can possibly be distinguished from chloride process rutile on the basis of trace elements such as niobium, vanadium and chromium, although it can be difficult to distinguish the purer grades. Elevated levels of lead may also be present in sulfate process titanium dioxide pigments, due to leaching from pipes and tanks during manufacture. | + | The anatase form of titanium dioxide was a common white pigment in the early 20th century. Anatase will transform to rutile on heating, and despite efforts to control this during the calcination step of pigment production, some early anatase pigments may have contained up to 20% of coarse, gritty rutile. The synthetic rutile pigment has significantly higher hiding power and greater resistance to chalking and discoloration on exposure to light than does the anatase pigment. Although experimental rutile pigments were patented in 1931 in Czechoslovakia, Germany and the United States, the first commercially viable methods for production were developed in 1937, based on the sulfate process, which used sulfuric acid to digest ilmenite or titaniferous slag. Industrial production began in 1938/39; in Europe, production was interrupted by World War II, and it was not until after 1945 that rutile pigment became available. The range of composition of the early white rutile pigments varied considerably, as various additives were used, including compounds of antimony, zinc, tin, magnesium, silicon and lithium, as well as anatase in some cases (to reduce cost). American products from 1939 on included: pure rutile (e.g., Titanox A-NC, coated with 1-2% aluminum oxide and silicon dioxide, manufactured until 1945); composites (e.g., Titanox RC grades, 30% titanium dioxide with calcium sulfate); and adulterations (e.g., Titanox M, 30% titanium dioxide with magnesium silicate; also titanated lithopones with 15% titanium dioxide). Although research to produce pigment from titanium tetrachloride had been underway since the 1920s, it was only when large quantities of chlorine were available to manufacturers that a pilot plant (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. in the United States) first produced pigment in 1948 using the chloride process. In this method, chlorine gas is reacted with an ore of high titanium dioxide content (generally rutile or synthetic rutile) followed by vapor phase oxidation. Anatase could also be produced using this method; however, it contained a significant amount of rutile and was only briefly offered. Because of differences in the manufacturing methods, sulfate process rutile can possibly be distinguished from the purer chloride process rutile on the basis of trace elements such as niobium, vanadium and chromium, although it can be difficult to distinguish the purer grades. Elevated levels of lead may also be present in sulfate process titanium dioxide pigments, due to leaching from pipes and tanks during manufacture. |
[[File:Gemrutilekes.jpg|thumb|Rutilated quartz pendant]] | [[File:Gemrutilekes.jpg|thumb|Rutilated quartz pendant]] | ||
Revision as of 17:45, 25 November 2016
Description
There are three naturally occurring isomorphic forms of Titanium dioxide: Anatase, rutile, and Brookite. Naturally occurring rutile can vary considerably in shape and in color (from yellow to brownish yellow, red, brown-red, brown, bluish or violet, rarely green, to greyish-black or black, due to various elemental impurities). Mineral rutile is mined from beach sand in Australia, and productive deposits also occur in Sierra Leone, South Africa, the United States, India, Norway, Sri Lanka, and Brazil. Small amounts of natural rutile may have been used as a pale yellow to red brown or nearly black pigment; however, it is difficult to grind and produces coarse, angular particles much different than the modern white pigment in color and morphology, and higher in impurities. Synthetic rutile gemstone crystals were first prepared in 1948 using the Verneuil process and can be produced in different colours depending on additives.
The anatase form of titanium dioxide was a common white pigment in the early 20th century. Anatase will transform to rutile on heating, and despite efforts to control this during the calcination step of pigment production, some early anatase pigments may have contained up to 20% of coarse, gritty rutile. The synthetic rutile pigment has significantly higher hiding power and greater resistance to chalking and discoloration on exposure to light than does the anatase pigment. Although experimental rutile pigments were patented in 1931 in Czechoslovakia, Germany and the United States, the first commercially viable methods for production were developed in 1937, based on the sulfate process, which used sulfuric acid to digest ilmenite or titaniferous slag. Industrial production began in 1938/39; in Europe, production was interrupted by World War II, and it was not until after 1945 that rutile pigment became available. The range of composition of the early white rutile pigments varied considerably, as various additives were used, including compounds of antimony, zinc, tin, magnesium, silicon and lithium, as well as anatase in some cases (to reduce cost). American products from 1939 on included: pure rutile (e.g., Titanox A-NC, coated with 1-2% aluminum oxide and silicon dioxide, manufactured until 1945); composites (e.g., Titanox RC grades, 30% titanium dioxide with calcium sulfate); and adulterations (e.g., Titanox M, 30% titanium dioxide with magnesium silicate; also titanated lithopones with 15% titanium dioxide). Although research to produce pigment from titanium tetrachloride had been underway since the 1920s, it was only when large quantities of chlorine were available to manufacturers that a pilot plant (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. in the United States) first produced pigment in 1948 using the chloride process. In this method, chlorine gas is reacted with an ore of high titanium dioxide content (generally rutile or synthetic rutile) followed by vapor phase oxidation. Anatase could also be produced using this method; however, it contained a significant amount of rutile and was only briefly offered. Because of differences in the manufacturing methods, sulfate process rutile can possibly be distinguished from the purer chloride process rutile on the basis of trace elements such as niobium, vanadium and chromium, although it can be difficult to distinguish the purer grades. Elevated levels of lead may also be present in sulfate process titanium dioxide pigments, due to leaching from pipes and tanks during manufacture.
Synonyms and Related Terms
titanium dioxide; synthetic rutile; imitation diamond; rutile (Eng., Fr.); rutilo (It., Esp., Port.); rutil (Nor., Sven.); ; Titanweiss (Rutil) (Deut.); leyko toy titanioy (Roytilio) (Gr.); bianco di titanio (rutilo) (It.); titaandioxide (rutiel) (Ned.); rútilo (Port.)
.jpg)
Other Properties
Tetragonal crystal system.
Optic sign uniaxial, positive.
Moh's hardness of mineral 6 to 6.5.
Particle size of modern pigment 0.2 - 0.5 micrometers.
High birefringence under crossed polars.
Non-fluorescent to weak white fluorescence (pigment).
Chemically inert, insoluble in water, organic solvents, aqueous alkalis; can be dissolved in sulfuric or hydrofluoric acid; slow to dry in oil without additives or surface treatment.
Absorbs strongly in the UV, is photochemically active but less so than anatase titanium dioxide.
| Composition | TiO2 |
|---|---|
| Mohs Hardness | 6.0 - 6.5 |
| Melting Point | 1640 |
| Density | 3.75-4.3 |
| Refractive Index | 2.71 - 2.72 |
Hazards and Safety
Nontoxic. No significant hazards.
Additional Information
° M.Laver, "Titanium Dioxide Whites", Artists Pigments, Volume 3, E. West FitzHugh (ed.), Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1997. ° Mineralogy Database: Rutile° Walter C. McCrone, "Polarized Light Microscopy in Conservation: A Personal Perspective" JAIC 33(2):101-14, 1994. (contains a table of dates on the history of titanium white as a pigment)
Comparisons
Natural and Simulated Diamonds
Characteristics of Common White Pigments
Additional Images
Rutile
Sources Checked for Data in Record
- Nicholas Eastaugh, Valentine Walsh, Tracey Chaplin, Ruth Siddall, Pigment Compendium, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2004
- R. J. Gettens, G.L. Stout, Painting Materials, A Short Encyclopaedia, Dover Publications, New York, 1966 Comment: density=4.2 and ref.index.=2.9, 2.6
- G.S.Brady, Materials Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1971 Comment: p. 815
- Ralph Mayer, A Dictionary of Art Terms and Techniques, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, 1969 (also 1945 printing)
- Encyclopedia Britannica, http://www.britannica.com Comment: "rutile" Encyclopædia Britannica [Accessed January 22, 2002].
- C.W.Chesterman, K.E.Lowe, Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Rocks and Minerals, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1979
- Thomas B. Brill, Light Its Interaction with Art and Antiquities, Plenum Press, New York City, 1980 Comment: ref. index = 2.61; 1.90;
- Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, at http://www.wikipedia.com Comment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutile (Accessed Sept. 14, 2005)
- Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia, Douglas M. Considine (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1976
- Random House, Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, Grammercy Book, New York, 1997
- The American Heritage Dictionary or Encarta, via Microsoft Bookshelf 98, Microsoft Corp., 1998