Difference between revisions of "Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) LC"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Description == | == Description == | ||
− | + | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanthium_strumarium Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium)] | |
== Historical importance == | == Historical importance == | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Analytical instrumentation and procedures == | == Analytical instrumentation and procedures == | ||
+ | HPLC-DAD-MS analysis was performed with an Agilent 1100 liquid chromatography system consisting of an automatic injector, a gradient pump, a HP series 1100 DAD, and an Agilent series 1100 VL on-line atmospheric pressure ionization electrospray ionization mass spectrometer. Separations were done on a Vydac 214TP52 analytical column (2.1 mm diameterX250 mm; 5-ím particle size). The column was eluted at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min with a tertiary gradient of water (A),acetonitrile (B), and 1% (v/v) aqueous formic acid (C) with the following elution program: 0 min, 90% A, 5% B, 5% C; 0-55 min, a linear gradient to 35% A, 60% B, 5% C; 55-60 min, a linear gradient elution to 15% A, 80% B, 5% C; 60-62 min, isocratic elution at 15% A, 80% B, 5% C; 62-70 min gradient elution to 90% A, 5% B, 5% C; and reequilibration with the latter solvent for 15 min. The mass spectrometer was run both in the negative and positive ion mode. | ||
== Chromatograms == | == Chromatograms == |
Latest revision as of 11:59, 30 October 2017
[[File:|thumb|Yellow Botanic Gardens]]
Description
Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium)
Historical importance
Summary of results
Analytical instrumentation and procedures
HPLC-DAD-MS analysis was performed with an Agilent 1100 liquid chromatography system consisting of an automatic injector, a gradient pump, a HP series 1100 DAD, and an Agilent series 1100 VL on-line atmospheric pressure ionization electrospray ionization mass spectrometer. Separations were done on a Vydac 214TP52 analytical column (2.1 mm diameterX250 mm; 5-ím particle size). The column was eluted at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min with a tertiary gradient of water (A),acetonitrile (B), and 1% (v/v) aqueous formic acid (C) with the following elution program: 0 min, 90% A, 5% B, 5% C; 0-55 min, a linear gradient to 35% A, 60% B, 5% C; 55-60 min, a linear gradient elution to 15% A, 80% B, 5% C; 60-62 min, isocratic elution at 15% A, 80% B, 5% C; 62-70 min gradient elution to 90% A, 5% B, 5% C; and reequilibration with the latter solvent for 15 min. The mass spectrometer was run both in the negative and positive ion mode.
Chromatograms
Sample information
Identified compounds
Compound | RT (min.) | MW | UV/vis | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|
xx | xx0 | xx | xx | Comments here |
x | x | x | x | |
x | x | x | x | |
x | x | x | x |
References
[1] [2] [3]